Expertise and legitimacy: the bureaux de style and the contemporary fashion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26563/dobras.v12i27.989

Keywords:

Bureaux de style. Fashion trend. Fashion system. Specialty. Discourse.

Abstract

This study deals with fashion trend forecasting companies, the bureaux de style, and the wide network of relationships organized by them in the fashion system, demonstrating their centrality in creating value for fashion products. Firstly, Giddens’s perspective on the modernity and the disengagement of direct experience, a vacuum which has been filled by specialized institutions, is discussed. In the fashion system, one of the most valued expertise along the chain is the knowledge of trends, which has been institutionalized through the bureaux de style in the 1960s. The main objective of this work is to analyze the role of bureaux de style in the current fashion system. To this end, the most relevant representatives were investigated to uncover the modalities and strategies of information about fashion trends – and of themselves as specialists. The documentary research involved the collection of images and text of companies of research of tendencies: Peclers, Promostyl, Carlin, DMI, View, WGSN, Use Fashion, TrendsTop, and TrendUnion. The data were analyzed with the aid of the MAXQDA software and it was based on the Grounded Theory fundamentals. The results lead to the questioning of the faith granted to these agencies. “Large” style houses are believed to hold their legitimacy because of their discourses and the circulation of specific representations, which can be seen as a branding strategy. The bureaux de style maintain and reiterate their specialist status as they continue to articulate demand, production, and consumption in fashion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, Rodrigo; CUNHA, Cristiano J. Grounded Theory. In: GODOI, Christiane; BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, Rodrigo; SILVA, Anielson. Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. São Paulo: Saraiva,. 2006,p. 241-266.

CASSIANI, Silvia Helena de Bortoli; CALIRI, Maria Helena Larcher; PELÁ, Nilza Teresa Rotter. A teoria fundamentada nos dados como abordagem da pesquisa interpretativa. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.Ribeirão Preto,v. 4, n. 3, p. 75-88,1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11691996000300007

CASTRO, Cleber; PEIXOTO, Maria Naíse; RIOS, Gisela. Riscos ambientais e geografia: conceituações, abordagens e escalas. Anuário do Instituto de Geociências, v.28, n.2, p.11-30, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.anuario.igeo.ufrj.br/anuario_2005/Anuario_2005_11_30.pdf. Acesso em: 8 jul.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11137/2005_2_11-30

CORBIN, Juliet; STRAUSS, Anselm. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory.3. ed. London: Sage, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

ERNER, Guillaume. Sociología de las tendencias. 1. ed. 2. reimp. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili, 2012.

GIDDENS, Anthony. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991. GIDDENS, Anthony. A vida em uma sociedade pós-tradicional. In: BECK, Ulrich. et al. (Ed.).

Modernização reflexiva: política, tradição e estética na ordem social moderna. São Paulo: Unesp, 2012. p. 89-166.

GORZ, André. O imaterial: conhecimento, valor e capital. São Paulo: Annablume, 2005.

KELLER, Paulo. O trabalho imaterial do estilista. Revista Teoria e Sociedade,v.2, n.15, p.8-29, 2007. Disponível em: http://ww.soa.fafich.ufmg.br/~revistasociedade/edicoes/ artigos/15_2/O_TRABALHO_IMATERIAL_DO_ESTILISTA.pdf. Acesso em: 1 jul. 2014.

LERFEL, Sarah. La règle d’or d’une tendance,c’est sa capacité à surprendre. In: BACRIE, Lydia (Ed.).Qu’est-ce qu’une tendance de mode?Paris: Fédération Française du Prêt à Porter Féminin, 2012. p. 28-33.

MAILLET, Thierry. Parisian fashion prediction companies: from sampling to style bureaus (1825-1975). Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/10784678/THE_ROLE_AND_FUNCTIONS_OF_FASHION_PREDICTION_COMPANIES_IN_FRANCE_1825-1975_. Acesso em: 19 jan. 2017.

MONÇORES, Aline. Tendências: o novo constante. 2013. 177f. Tese (Doutorado) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Design, Departamento de Artes e Design,Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2013.

MÜLLER, Florence. Tendances et innovations. In: BACRIE, Lydia (Ed.). Qu’est-ce qu’une tendance de mode? Paris: Fédération Française du Prêt à Porter Féminin, 2012. p. 16-27.

RODI, Nelly. Tendances et communautés. In: BACRIE, Lydia (Ed.).Qu’est-ce qu’une tendance de mode?Paris: FédérationFrançaiseduPrêt à Porter Féminin, 2012. p. 34-43

SANT’ANNA MÜLLER, Mara Rúbia. Prêt-à-porter, discussões em torno de seu surgimento e relação com a alta-costura francesa. Projética Revista Científica de Design, v.2, n.2, p.114-127, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/projetica/article/viewFile/8856/9267. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-2207.2011v2n2p114

VINCENT-RICARD, Françoise. As espirais da moda. [Objets de la mode]. 5.ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2008.

WALSHAM, Geoff. Interpreting information systems in organizations. Nova York: Wiley, 1993.

Published

2019-12-19

How to Cite

CAMPOS, A. Q. Expertise and legitimacy: the bureaux de style and the contemporary fashion. dObra[s] – revista da Associação Brasileira de Estudos de Pesquisas em Moda, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 27, p. 193–205, 2019. DOI: 10.26563/dobras.v12i27.989. Disponível em: https://dobras.emnuvens.com.br/dobras/article/view/989. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles